July 1, 2014


The 8 Best Lines From Ginsburg’s Dissent on the Hobby Lobby Contraception Decision: 
1) “The exemption sought by Hobby Lobby and Conestoga would…deny legions of women who do not hold their employers’ beliefs access to contraceptive coverage”
2) “Religious organizations exist to foster the interests of persons subscribing to the same religious faith. Not so of for-profit corporations. Workers who sustain the operations of those corporations commonly are not drawn from one religious community.”
3) “Any decision to use contraceptives made by a woman covered under Hobby Lobby’s or Conestoga’s plan will not be propelled by the Government, it will be the woman’s autonomous choice, informed by the physician she consults.”
4) “It bears note in this regard that the cost of an IUD is nearly equivalent to a month’s full-time pay for workers earning the minimum wage.”
5) “Would the exemption…extend to employers with religiously grounded objections to blood transfusions (Jehovah’s Witnesses); antidepressants (Scientologists); medications derived from pigs, including anesthesia, intravenous fluids, and pills coated with gelatin (certain Muslims, Jews, and Hindus); and vaccinations[?]…Not much help there for the lower courts bound by today’s decision.”
6) “Approving some religious claims while deeming others unworthy of accommodation could be ‘perceived as favoring one religion over another,’ the very ‘risk the [Constitution’s] Establishment Clause was designed to preclude.”
7) “My five male colleagues, in a decision of startling breadth, would allow corporations to opt out of almost any law that they find “incompatible with their sincerely held religious beliefs.”
8) “The court, I fear, has ventured into a minefield.”

The 8 Best Lines From Ginsburg’s Dissent on the Hobby Lobby Contraception Decision: 

1) “The exemption sought by Hobby Lobby and Conestoga would…deny legions of women who do not hold their employers’ beliefs access to contraceptive coverage”

2) “Religious organizations exist to foster the interests of persons subscribing to the same religious faith. Not so of for-profit corporations. Workers who sustain the operations of those corporations commonly are not drawn from one religious community.”

3) “Any decision to use contraceptives made by a woman covered under Hobby Lobby’s or Conestoga’s plan will not be propelled by the Government, it will be the woman’s autonomous choice, informed by the physician she consults.”

4) “It bears note in this regard that the cost of an IUD is nearly equivalent to a month’s full-time pay for workers earning the minimum wage.”

5) “Would the exemption…extend to employers with religiously grounded objections to blood transfusions (Jehovah’s Witnesses); antidepressants (Scientologists); medications derived from pigs, including anesthesia, intravenous fluids, and pills coated with gelatin (certain Muslims, Jews, and Hindus); and vaccinations[?]…Not much help there for the lower courts bound by today’s decision.”

6) “Approving some religious claims while deeming others unworthy of accommodation could be ‘perceived as favoring one religion over another,’ the very ‘risk the [Constitution’s] Establishment Clause was designed to preclude.”

7) “My five male colleagues, in a decision of startling breadth, would allow corporations to opt out of almost any law that they find “incompatible with their sincerely held religious beliefs.”

8) “The court, I fear, has ventured into a minefield.”

564 notes
hobby lobby contraception ginsburg lines dissent supreme court scotus relisgious freedome fem2

564 Notes

  1. bustyyorneekaps reblogged this from guerrillagirlsontour
  2. theravensdesk reblogged this from guerrillagirlsontour
  3. sekma reblogged this from guerrillagirlsontour
  4. theflamingfeminist reblogged this from guerrillagirlsontour
  5. kitesh reblogged this from firststariseetonight
  6. flowers-and-feminism reblogged this from guerrillagirlsontour
  7. justdianaherself reblogged this from guerrillagirlsontour
  8. whiiite-blank-wonderwall reblogged this from create-a-spark
  9. qaydee reblogged this from feministsunitedtxst
  10. whirling-dervish reblogged this from texnessa
  11. feministsunitedtxst reblogged this from guerrillagirlsontour
  12. granteed reblogged this from sytten
  13. ladaballada reblogged this from prochoiceamerica
  14. thepoisoneddart reblogged this from guerrillagirlsontour
  15. shiroikira reblogged this from guerrillagirlsontour
  16. thatopinionatedfemme reblogged this from bitethepatriarchy
  17. craigmac1989 reblogged this from tristenmingle
  18. vonneslut reblogged this from spirit-wormwood
  19. thegirlwiththeburritotattoo reblogged this from tristenmingle
  20. ambivalent-feminist reblogged this from equality-not-revenge
  21. preppy-by-the-c reblogged this from equality-not-revenge
  22. cumberdoodle reblogged this from guerrillagirlsontour
  23. prodigy-in-need- reblogged this from equality-not-revenge
  24. equality-not-revenge reblogged this from guerrillagirlsontour
  25. sytten reblogged this from jollyswagger
  26. jollyswagger reblogged this from beatlechicksteph
  27. ontophantoms reblogged this from lostbetweenthenotes
  28. lostbetweenthenotes reblogged this from brambleandscoot
  29. theinvinciblebookworm reblogged this from beatlechicksteph
  30. beatlechicksteph reblogged this from morecks87
  31. morecks87 reblogged this from texnessa
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus